storySep 24, 2026 · 6 min read

Tampa Replaced a 70-Point Defenceman With a 36-Year-Old.

Tampa was the fifth-best team in hockey by chance share and lost a Game 7 to Montreal, a 48 percent team with the best finishing luck in the NHL. Then it let Darren Raddysh sign an eight-year deal in Toronto and replaced him with 36-year-old John Carlson at the same cap hit. Kucherov has one year left.

Share
Tampa Replaced a 70-Point Defenceman With a 36-Year-Old.

By the only measure that survives a bad bounce, the Tampa Bay Lightning were the fifth-best team in hockey last season. At 5-on-5 they generated 2.67 expected goals per 60 minutes, fourth in the NHL, and allowed 2.28, fifth. A 54 percent share, behind Colorado, Carolina, Ottawa and Vegas and ahead of everyone else. They won 50 games and 106 points, Nikita Kucherov won the Hart with 130 points, Andrei Vasilevskiy won the Vezina, Jon Cooper won the Jack Adams.

Then they lost in the first round, in seven games, in overtime, to the Montreal Canadiens. Fourth straight first-round exit.

Here is the part worth sitting with before grading the summer. Montreal was a 48 percent team at 5-on-5, 24th in the league by chance share. What Montreal had was the best finishing luck in the NHL: 23.5 goals above what the quality of its chances said it should have scored, first of 32. Tampa did not lose that series to a better team. It lost it to a hotter one, over seven games, which is the smallest sample in which anything in hockey gets decided.

Expected goal share at 5-on-5, 2025-26, top six
Colorado
56.9
Carolina
56.3
Ottawa
55.6
Vegas
54.4
Tampa Bay
54
Utah
52.4
Per MoneyPuck. Tampa created chances at the fourth-best rate in the league and allowed them at the fifth-best, the only team in the top five at both ends. Montreal, which eliminated the Lightning in seven games, was 24th at 48 percent.

So the question for general manager Julien BriseBois was whether to change a team that is doing almost everything right, and the answer the cap gave him was that he had to change one thing whether he wanted to or not.

What left

Darren Raddysh had the season of his life: 22 goals and 70 points from the blue line, a 62 percent expected-goal share, and at 5-on-5 the highest chance-generation rate of any Tampa defenceman at 3.01 expected goals for per 60. On June 19 he signed an eight-year contract worth $68 million and was traded to Toronto for a fifth-round pick in the same transaction. Nick Paul went to Toronto too, on July 1, for goaltender Dennis Hildeby and two picks. Oliver Bjorkstrand signed with the Rangers, Corey Perry went back to Los Angeles.

Losing Raddysh is the one that matters, and it is worth being honest about what Tampa lost and what it sold.

Darren Raddysh, points by season
His previous career high 3732022-23332023-24372024-25702025-26
Per NHL. Two seasons in the mid-30s, then 70. His shot volume nearly doubled, from 108 to 212, and his shooting percentage went from 5.6 percent to 10.4. His 22 goals came on 13.8 expected. Some of that is a real change in role. Some of it is a contract year, and Toronto has paid for eight more of them.

Raddysh scored 22 goals on 13.8 expected. That is eight goals of finishing above what his shots deserved, in the year before free agency, at 30 years old, and Toronto has committed to him until he is 38. Tampa taking a fifth-round pick rather than matching that is defensible on its own terms. It is the replacement that raises the question.

What arrived

John Carlson signed for two years at $8.5 million a season, the same cap hit Toronto gave Raddysh, at 36 years old. He is a right shot, which BriseBois wanted, and he is a legitimate offensive defenceman: 14 goals and 60 points last season, split between Washington and Anaheim after a deadline trade, a 54 percent share. He is also four years older than the man he replaces and, by the chance data, meaningfully worse in his own end.

2025-26, 5-on-5 unless noted
Raddysh (out)
vs
Carlson (in)
Individual expected goals
13.8
11.5
Expected goals for per 60
3.01
3.00
Expected goals against per 60
2.32
2.62
Expected goal share
56%
53%
On-ice goal margin
+22
+14
Age this season
30
36
Cap hit
$8.5M
$8.5M
Signed through
2033-34 (Toronto)
2027-28
5 of 8edges2 of 8
Per MoneyPuck and NHL.com. The two generate chances at an identical rate. The difference is the other end: Carlson's teams gave up 0.30 more expected goals per 60 with him on the ice, which is about ten goals across a season of top-four minutes. Tampa swapped four years of age for two years of term and took the defensive hit.

The rest of the summer was small and sensible. Ilya Mikheyev on four years at $3.9 million is a depth signing at a depth price. Jeffrey Viel on five years at $2.5 million is a long commitment to a fourth-liner. J.J. Moser's eight-year extension at $6.75 million, signed back in December, kicks in now, and he earned it: a 56 percent share in the most minutes of any Tampa defenceman. Hildeby, 24, is there to take starts off Vasilevskiy, who is 32 and has now played nine straight 30-win seasons.

Victor Hedman, the captain, was away from the team for the final 22 games of the season and the playoff run. He was back on the ice on the first day of camp. That absence is a large part of why the blue line looked thin in April, and his return matters more to this group than any signing.

The number nobody is talking about

Kucherov is in the last year of his contract. He turned 33 in June, he scored 130 points, he is extension-eligible now, and he can be an unrestricted free agent in July 2027. BriseBois has confirmed conversations with his agent and has said it was not the priority during free agency. Tampa has about $3.2 million in cap space.

That is the real stake of the 2026-27 season. Not whether a 54 percent team makes the playoffs, which it will, but whether the franchise that has been to the second round once in four years can convince its best player that the window is still open.

The case for the summer, stated fairly

Raddysh at eight years and $8.5 million through age 38 is a contract Tampa was right to decline, and a fifth-round pick is not nothing for a player who was going to leave regardless. Carlson on two years carries no long-term risk, fills a right-shot hole, and was signed specifically to fix a power play that ranked 17th. Hildeby addresses the one structural problem the analytics flag, which is Vasilevskiy's workload and his .886 save percentage across the last four playoff runs. And the underlying team is excellent: fourth in chance creation, fifth in suppression, with the reigning Hart and Vezina winners both signed.

Verdict

Where this lands

The case for the summer

Tampa declined an eight-year deal for a 30-year-old who scored 22 goals on 13.8 expected, took a pick for him, and replaced the minutes on a two-year term with no tail. Moser is extended, Hildeby lightens the goaltending load, and the underlying team was fifth in the league by chances.

The case against

The blue line replaced its best driver with a defenceman four years older who allows 0.30 more expected goals per 60, and the reigning Hart Trophy winner is a year from free agency with $3.2 million of cap space to work with. Four straight first-round exits is now a pattern the roster data cannot explain away.

The Lightning do not need to be better to win a round. They need seven games where the other team is not the luckiest finishing side in hockey. That is not a plan, which is exactly the problem.

What it means

Tampa will be a top-five team by chances again. Kucherov, Hagel at a 59 percent share, Cirelli at 56, Point, Moser and a healthy Hedman guarantee it. Watch two things instead of the standings. The first is expected goals against per 60, which was 2.28 with Raddysh and will tell you inside a month whether Carlson at 36 holds up in those minutes. The second is Kucherov's contract. A team this good with this little cap room and a 33-year-old superstar on an expiring deal is one bad October from a genuinely difficult conversation, and the Lightning have spent four years proving that being the better team in April guarantees nothing at all.

Was this worth reading?
Thanks — noted.
Share this story